Cozamin Mine Estimated Mineral Reserves as at April 30, 2020
Classification |
Tonnes (kt) |
Copper (%) |
Silver (g/t) |
Zinc (%) |
Pb (%) |
Copper Metal (kt) |
Silver Metal (koz) |
Zinc Metal (kt) |
Lead Metal (kt) |
Proven |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Probable |
10,178 |
1.79 |
41 |
0.36 |
0.05 |
182 |
13,527 |
36 |
5 |
Proven + Probable |
10,178 |
1.79 |
41 |
0.36 |
0.05 |
182 |
13,527 |
36 |
5 |
NOTE: Tucker Jensen, P.Eng., Superintendent Mine Operations at Capstone Mining Corp., is the Qualified Person for this Cozamin Mineral Reserve update. Disclosure of the Cozamin Mineral Reserves as of April 30, 2020 was completed using fully diluted mineable stope shapes generated by the Maptek Vulcan Mine Stope Optimizer software and estimated using the 2020 MNFWZ resource block model created by Garth Kirkham, P.Geo., FGC and the 2017 MNV resource block model created by J. Vincent, P.Geo., formerly of Capstone Mining Corp. Mineral Reserves are reported at a US$52.29/t net smelter return (“NSR”) cut-off using the NSR20CuRSV formula: ($50.762*%Cu + $0.412*Ag ppm)*(1-NSRRoyalty%) for copper zones based on metal price assumptions (in US$) of Cu = $2.75/lb and Ag = $17.00/oz, and metal recoveries of 96% Cu, 86% Ag and the NSR20ZnRSV formula: ($49.756*%Cu + $0.381*Ag ppm + $8.035*%Pb + $11.820*%Zn)*(1-NSRRoyalty%) for zinc zones based on metal price assumptions (in US$) of Cu = $2.75/lb, Ag = $17.00/oz, Pb = $0.90/lb, Zn = $1.00/lb and metal recoveries of 94% Cu, 78% Ag, 47% Pb and 67% Zn. Mineral reserve calculations consider mining by long-hole stoping and mineral processing by flotation. Tonnage and grade estimates include dilution and mining losses and do not include unmined pillars as described in Table 4. The NSR royalty rate applied varies between 1% and 3% depending on the mining concession, and royalties are treated as costs in mineral reserve estimation. An exchange rate of MX$20 per US$1 is assumed. All metals are reported as contained. Figures may not sum exactly due to rounding.
Cozamin Mine Estimated Mineral Resources as at April 30, 2020
Classification |
Tonnes (kt) |
Copper (%) |
Silver (g/t) |
Zinc (%) |
Pb (%) |
Copper Metal (kt) |
Silver Metal (koz) |
Zinc Metal (kt) |
Lead Metal (kt) |
Measured (M) |
409 |
1.23 |
53 |
1.23 |
0.40 |
5 |
699 |
5 |
2 |
Indicated (I) |
27,050 |
1.57 |
44 |
1.14 |
0.31 |
425 |
38,509 |
309 |
85 |
Total M + I |
27,459 |
1.57 |
44 |
1.14 |
0.32 |
430 |
39,209 |
314 |
87 |
Inferred |
16,558 |
0.64 |
36 |
2.26 |
0.61 |
106 |
18,983 |
375 |
101 |
NOTE: Mineral Resources are classified according to CIM (2014) definitions, estimated following CIM (2019) guidelines and have an effective date of April 30, 2020. Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The independent Qualified Person for the estimates is Mr. Garth D. Kirkham, P. Geo., FGC., of Kirkham Geosystems Ltd. Mineral Resources are reported using NSR20RES formula: (Cu*$60.535 + Ag*$0.472 + Zn*14.865 + Pb*$9.147)*(1-Royalty%) based on metal price assumptions (in US$) of Cu = $3.25/lb, Ag = $20.00/oz, Zn = $1.20/lb, Pb = $1.00/lb, metal recoveries of 95% Cu, 82% Ag, 70% Zn, 48% Pb, confidential current smelter contract terms, transportation costs and royalty agreements from 1 to 3%, as applicable, are incorporated. An exchange rate of MX$20 per US$1 is assumed. Totals may not sum exactly due to rounding. The NSR cut-off of US$50/tonne is based on historical mining and milling costs plus general and administrative costs. The Mineral Resource Estimate encompasses both the MNFWZ and the MNV. Drilling campaigns from 2018 have focused on the MNFWZ and no drilling has been performed on the MNV since 2017. The Mineral Resource considers underground mining by longhole stoping and mineral processing by flotation. No dilution is incorporated in the Mineral Resource. All metals are reported as contained. Mineral Resource estimates do not account for mining loss and dilution. These Mineral Resource estimates include Inferred Mineral Resources considered too speculative geologically to apply economic considerations for categorization as Mineral Reserves. However, it is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Resources.